🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.